The Scorecard of the Adelaide 2024-25 Test resembles to Perth 2011-12 Test

Adelaide 2024-25 Test Scorecard resembles to Perth 2011-12 Test

The 2011-12 Test match between India and Australia at WACA, Perth, in many ways, runs parallel with Adelaide’s Test of the series 2024-25: batting debacles, significant performances by a few individuals, and managing fast bowlers. Both see brutal Australian fast bowlers in action, while India withers under pressure under rocked pitch conditions. Most of the elements described above are assessed in individual performances, batting failures by India, and Australia’s nasty bowling attack.

India’s plight during the Perth Test of 2011-12

The Collapse of India’s Batting: A Repetition of Events

India’s First Innings: 161-10

Earlier, it was Perth where Indian Batters failed to withstand the fast bowling attack of Australia, and it seems Australia is creating disintegration in the batting order of India in both innings. The first innings ended up with just 161 runs, and the top order collapsed. Gautam Gambhir at the number three position scored only 31 runs in front of the 44 runs scored by Virat Kohli in what can be termed a courageous playing effort. However, players such as Virender Sehwag (0), Sachin Tendulkar (15), and Rahul Dravid (9) remained almost scoreless. Neither did the middle-order contribute much, with the wicketkeeper adding just 12 runs to the list, while the others fell cheaply because of the pace.

India’s second Innings: 171-10

Again, it was below expectations, for only 171 runs were possible in the second innings. Rahul Dravid batted hard, scoring 47 unlike Kohli, who came into his own once again with a brilliant 75. But the rest of the run-scorers succumbed to the pressure. Gambhir scored 14, but Sehwag (10), Tendulkar (8), and Dhoni (2) could not. There was a very apparent weakness in the capability of India’s batsmen to put together partnerships. And that is where they are beaten, as Australia marches away into the next lead, refusing to offer India a chance of caving in.

Australians’ Dominant Bowling-Peps: Ben Hilfenhaus

The Australian bowling technique strikes a chord: it is merciless and precise. The Australian bowlers were impressive, availing WACA’s fast and bouncy surface with catastrophic results. The star performer was Ben Hilfenhaus, who enjoyed the match with nine scalps. His first-innings figures of 4/43 set the tone, while his second-innings haul of 5/54 dismantled India’s batting lineup. In support was Peter Siddle with 3/42 and 3/43 spread across the two innings while, with pace and accuracy, he consistently troubled the Indian batsmen. Mitchell Starc lent a hand in making those important breakthroughs by taking 2/39 and 2/31 in the two innings.

The sharpest pointer to the division between these two teams was what today passed for discipline and aggression from Australian pacers. Australia’s bowlers hit tight lines and got the ball to swing; India’s batsmen looked rather unsure about their footwork and defensive techniques and succumbed to the pressure time and again.

Batting in Australia during the Perth Test of 2011-12

Australian Batting: Warner’s Brilliance with a Team Work 

Australia scored their first innings courtesy of a sparkling knock from David Warner, who scored 180 runs himself. Opening the innings, Warner took the Indian bowlers to task, smashing 20 fours and 5 sixes in a 159-ball blitzkrieg. His innings had set the entire tone for Australian supremacy which was backed up well by Ed Cowan’s monotonous 74. The middle order, however, included Ricky Ponting (7) and Michael Clarke (18) and did not contribute heavily, but the tail-end hand, led by Peter Siddle’s quick 30, made sure that Australia posted an imposing total of 369 runs.

Needless to say, the second innings was rendered superfluous after Australia imposed the follow-on upon India after bundling them out for 161 in their first innings. Australia with a massive lead of 208 runs then swiftly wrapped up offering its bowlers to usher in an innings-and-37-run victory against India.

Man of the Match: David Warner

David Warner must be the sole star of the match, with a booming 180 in the first innings putting Australia in a really strong position. His types of application not only demoralized Indian bowlers but also ensured Australia had the upper hand throughout the match. Undoubtedly, Warner’s innings go on par with any of the most unforgettable innings in Australia’s Test cricket history.

Perth Test Significance 

Much was evident about how far varying sides presently can cope with adversity from the Test match held at Perth during the years 2011-2012. Along with the bounce and seaming nature that was present in the pace at WACA, India suffered a lot as it would be caused by defeat. It also focuses on how much batter and bowler can teach teens about resilience and mental toughness in proving performances. It was a harsh lesson for India about having a hard time playing overseas as they faced quite a bit of quality opposition.

The parallels from this match led to the 2024-25 Adelaide Test and yet again India fell apart in the face of an impressive Australian pace attack. The echo of batting collapses will aptly be matched by the unbearable pressure of difficult pitches, reminding a long distance yet to be covered by a side to reproduce those standards consistently.

India vs Australia: BGT 2024- The Battle Of Supremacy 

The second Test match for India and Australia was the 2024-25 Border-Gavaskar Trophy match with Australia as a tour de force due to the brilliant bowling and solid batting contributions that put them firmly in the driving seat from the start.

  • After winning the coin toss, India decided to bat first, but their innings was not up to the mark in the beginning. Mitchell Starc made a great effort in that spell, capturing 6 wickets for 48 runs; with good support from Pat Cummins (2/41) and Scott Boland (2/54). The Indian batters could not build up much on their partnerships. Besides KL Rahul (37) and Nitish Reddy (42), it was an otherwise lackluster performance, where India ended with a total of just 180 runs.
  • In reply, Australia responded with a lot of grit as Usman Khawaja and Nathan McSweeney only opened quite cautiously. Khawaja made only 13, but McSweeney’s measured knock followed by contributions from Marnus Labuschagne (64) and Travis Head (140) placed the hosts in a formidable position.

Australia probably managed to chase the target with much ado about nothing in Level 1. The victory was rather important for the hosts as they showed the ability to come back after the first Test defeat. Travis Head and Mitchell Starc were the real standout performers, along with their innings.

Analytical Conclusion

The history of Indian performances in Perth (2011-12) and Adelaide (2024-25) appears to be the repeat of the same song: a tendency to falter against a quality pace attack in difficult conditions. Both these matches were relieved under fast bowlers creating havoc by exploiting the conditions to put India out of step, and further innings from Australian batters added to the total.

The bounce was not negotiated well at WACA in the year 2011-12, and therefore, it resulted in quick batting collapses. Although some resistance was offered occasionally by Tendulkar and Kohli, the team lacked the depth and resilience to be in sufficient shape to play competitively. Such a situation was enjoyed by Australia, where a powerful 180 set up by Warner was enough to consolidate its commanding hold. Hilfenhaus, with Pattinson and Siddle providing him backup, destroyed the Indians and recorded a resounding win.

Just as 2024-25 was beginning, trial by fire lay ahead in terms of Adelaide and the starry pink ball under which Australia took on India, with Mitchell Starc and Pat Cummins exposing all technical flaws in India’s lineup. The individual potential was exhibited by Nitish Reddy, but as a collective, the entire team was pretty much subpar. Travis Head’s counterattacking innings for 140 helped to underline Australia as much as David Warner’s efforts in Perth, accentuating their ability to assert control when they could do so at conditions favoring them. Indeed, these matches speak of what makes Test cricket so challenging in Australia where conditioning is stretched to the limits of mental strength as well as technical skill. 

Valuable takeaways

  • Core Inspections India’s Continuous Debilitating Factors Overseas– Against high-quality overseas pace bowling, India struggled miserably in both Perth (2011-12) and Adelaide (2024-25). Immense in-built technical and mental deficiencies of the young brigade thus demand a tougher reaction from the newer azimuth, especially on high-pitch and very-bouncy pitches during pressure moments.
  • Australia’s Bowling Tradition: From the two performances in Perth by Ben Hilfenhaus and the performance of Mitchell Starc and Pat Cummins in Adelaide, Australia does produce many more world-class pacers. The biggest exponent of this ability still exploits conditions perfectly, but adds relentless pressure, sometimes disbanding entire batting line-ups, thus changing the course of matches.
  • Individual’s Developmental Influence: David Warner’s explosive 180 at Perth and the counter-attacking 140 by Travis Head at Adelaide are examples of how greater individual form could turn the balance. Both these innings opened large leads and set an impending mental imbalance on the opposition, putting India under very large pressure.
  • Signs of Improvement While Indicating Similarities: Although the battle continued for India against pace, certain improvements were seen in Adelaide. The fiery stand by Nitish Reddy and the leadership shown by Bumrah indicate potential development from the one-sided contest at Perth. However, this is a very difficult task to achieve for India.
  • The Value of Contextual Adaptation: Both types of tests give a clear message that life in Australia requires more than just technical know-how demands mental fortitude and adaptability to changes in strategy. India’s continual woes seem to make a case for better preparation and, indeed, strategic flexibility to counter Australia’s prowess at home.

For India, it is important to address these old and repetitious deficiencies while building on the few promising isolated acts to put together a more competitive unit. And for Australia, it gives credence to their record at home, the legacy of marvelous fast bowling, and terrific batting.

For more exciting content, please visit Cricviewpoint!

By Sudip

Related Post